SC questions second chance for those left out of NRC Assam

The Supreme Court asked the Union government whether it is giving the over 40 lakh people excluded from the National Register of Citizens (NRC) in Assam, a “second chance” to gain citizenship by allowing them to produce fresh documents to prove their Indian legacy.

share this post:

Why it is in news?

  • The Supreme Court  asked the Union government whether it is giving the over 40 lakh people  excluded from the National Register of Citizens (NRC) in Assam,  a “second chance” to gain citizenship by allowing them to produce fresh documents to prove their Indian legacy.
  • The court was referring to the Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) proposed by the government, which allows a claimant for Indian citizenship to “change his legacy” by submitting additional documents at the ‘claims and objections’ stage.
  • The court asked whether this would amount to “re-doing the claims” of those left out from the draft NRC published on July 30.
  • A Bench of Justices  said allowing a claimant to change his legacy would amount to “tinkering with the family tree” and re-doing the verification process.

'Why change tack?'

  • Besides  the Bench pointed out the government, in the beginning, had specified that documents on legacy would be allowed to be filed only once.
  •  Now, it has changed tack to permit additional documents to be filed.
  • The court directed Assam State NRC Coordinator Prateek Hajela to file a report on the ramifications of the government’s proposal to submit fresh documents.
  • Meanwhile, the court deferred the receipt of claims and objections to a later date.
  • This stage was supposed to start within the next days, on August 30, and would have continued till October 28.
  • Allowing a person to suddenly pull out an additional document, that too at the ‘claims and objections’ stage, will upset the apple cart
  • onsequences are so severe that should they be given one more chance.
  • Suppose a claimant has misfired once but can deliver in the next. Why should such a person not be given another chance?

Sample re-verification

  • The Supreme Court further asked  to submit a report with a time-frame to carry out the sample re-verification of at least 10 per cent of the names included in the final draft NRC.
  • This is after Co ordinator placed before the Bench a district-wise data of the percentage of the population who have been excluded from the final draft NRC.

Source

The Hindu